%20(Feb%202026).jpg)
Let’s address the elephant in the room. When employees hear “AI”, not many are thinking: “Great, this will help me work smarter.” A lot of them are thinking: “Is this going to replace me?”
If your organisation is rolling out AI tools, talking about automation, or even just experimenting quietly, that fear exists whether you acknowledge it or not. And ignoring it doesn’t make it disappear, it just drives it underground.
In 2026, one of the most important jobs internal comms has is helping organisations talk about AI without triggering panic, cynicism or mass LinkedIn profile updates.
Most employee anxiety around AI isn’t about the tools themselves. It’s about uncertainty.
People worry about:
If leadership communication is vague, overly optimistic or silent, employees fill the gaps themselves. And the stories they invent are rarely flattering.
This is where employee engagement tools and listening become critical. If you’re not actively listening, you won’t even know what people are worried about until it shows up as disengagement or attrition.
Let’s start with a few classics that don’t help:
“AI won’t affect jobs.”
Nobody believes this.
“AI will only make things better.”
That’s not how change works.
“We don’t have all the details yet, but trust us.”
Dangerous.
Over-reassurance erodes trust faster than honesty ever could.
Effective AI comms sound grounded, not grand.
They acknowledge that AI will change how work is done, and that some roles will evolve. They explain that the organisation’s intention is to use AI to remove low-value tasks, not people. They talk openly about reskilling, support and learning, rather than pretending nothing will change.
Most importantly, they reinforce that human judgement, creativity and context still matter (and are still valued) and always will.
This is where change comms principles really come into play. People don’t need certainty. They need credibility.
Employees watch leaders closely during moments of change. If leaders sound uncomfortable, evasive or overly scripted, people notice.
Internal comms teams can help leaders:
A short, authentic leadership video explaining how AI fits into the organisation’s direction will always land better than a long written statement no one trusts.
This is exactly where video creation and campaign-style comms make a difference: repeated, consistent messaging beats a one-off announcement every time.
AI anxiety doesn’t get resolved by announcements. It gets resolved by conversation.
That means:
If people feel they can’t ask honest questions internally, they’ll ask them externally. Or worse, they’ll stop engaging altogether.
This is where employee engagement tools and a clear comms strategy are essential. You need systems that surface concerns early, not once it’s already a problem.
Handled well, AI can actually strengthen trust.
When organisations communicate clearly, listen properly and involve people in how AI is used, employees feel respected rather than replaced. They see AI as something happening with them, not to them.
That doesn’t happen by accident. It happens when internal comms is treated as a strategic partner, not just a message service.
AI isn’t just a technology shift. It’s a trust test.
Internal comms teams are uniquely placed to help organisations pass it - by being honest, human and proactive. Clear guardrails, credible reassurance, two-way dialogue and visible follow-through matter far more than shiny tools or grand statements.
And if your organisation is struggling to find the right words, the right tone, or the right approach, that’s exactly what a comms health check is for.
AI might be clever. But good communication is still what makes it work.